Court Limits Schools Considering Race
Published: June 28, 2007
WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected school assignment plans that take account of students' race in two major public school districts. The decisions could imperil similar plans nationwide.
The rulings in cases affecting schools in Louisville, Ky., and Seattle leave public school systems with a limited arsenal to maintain racial diversity.
The court split, 5-4, with Chief Justice John Roberts announcing the court's judgment. Justice Stephen Breyer wrote a dissent that was joined by the court's other three liberals.
Justice Anthony Kennedy wrote a concurring opinion in which he said race may be a component of school district plans designed to achieve diversity.
He agreed with Roberts that the plans in Louisville and Seattle went too far. He said, however, that to the extent that Roberts' opinion could be interpreted as foreclosing the use of race in any circumstance, ''I disagree with that reasoning.''
The two school systems in Thursday's decisions employ slightly different methods of taking students' race into account when determining which school they would attend.
Federal appeals courts had upheld both plans after some parents sued. The Bush administration the parents' side, arguing that racial diversity is a noble goal but can be sought only through race-neutral means.
Louisville's schools spent 25 years under a court order to eliminate the effects of state-sponsored segregation. After a federal judge freed the Jefferson County, Ky., school board, which encompasses Louisville, from his supervision, the board decided to keep much of the court-ordered plan in place to prevent schools from re-segregating.
The lawyer for the Louisville system called the plan a success story that enjoys broad community support, including among parents of white and black students.
The Seattle school district said it used race as one among many factors, relied on it only in some instances and then only at the end of a lengthy process in allocating students among the city's high schools. Seattle suspended its program after parents sued.
The opinion was the first on the divisive issue since 2003, when a 5-4 ruling upheld the limited consideration of race in college admissions to attain a diverse student body. Since then, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who approved of the limited use of race, retired. Her replacement, Justice Samuel Alito was in the majority that struck down the school system plans in Kentucky and Washington.
Use of Race in School
By DAVID STOUT
Published: June 28, 2007
WASHINGTON, June 28 In a decision of sweeping importance to educators, parents and schoolchildren across the country, the Supreme Court today sharply limited the ability of school districts to manage the racial makeup of the student bodies in their schools.
Chief Justice John Roberts, right, wrote the majoritys decision. Justice Stephen Breyer wrote the dissent.
The court voted, 5 to 4,
to reject diversity plans from Seattle and Louisville, Ky., declaring that the
districts had failed to meet their heavy burden of justifying the
extreme means they have chosen discriminating among individual students
based on race by relying upon racial classifications in making school assignments,
as Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. wrote for the court.
Todays decision, one of the most important in years on the issue of race and education, need not entirely eliminate race as a factor in assigning students to different schools, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy wrote in a separate opinion. But it will surely prompt many districts to review and perhaps revise programs they already have in place, or go back to the drawing boards in designing plans.
The opinions rationale relied in part on the historic 1954 decision in Brown vs. Board of Education that outlawed segregation in public schools a factor that the dissenters on the court found to be a cruel irony, and which they objected to in emotional terms.
Chief Justice Roberts said the officials in Seattle and in Jefferson County, Ky., which includes Louisville, had failed to show that their plans considered race in the context of a larger educational concept, and therefore did not pass muster.
In the present cases, Chief Justice Roberts wrote, recalling words from an earlier Supreme Court ruling, race is not considered as part of a broader effort to achieve exposure to widely diverse people, cultures, ideas, and viewpoints.
Even as to race, he went on, the plans here employ only a limited notion of diversity, viewing race exclusively in white/nonwhite terms in Seattle and black/other terms in Jefferson County.
Classifying and assigning schoolchildren according to a binary conception of race is an extreme approach in light of this courts precedents and the nations history of using race in public schools, and requires more than such an amorphous end to justify it.
In the now familiar lineup, Justices Kennedy, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Samuel A. Alito Jr. sided with the chief justice on most points.
Rather than working toward a level of diversity and its purported benefits, the chief justice wrote, the school had worked backwards to achieve a particular type of racial balance.
This is a fatal flaw, the ruling said. When it comes to using race to assign children to schools, history will be heard.
The four dissenters wrote, in effect, that the majority was standing history on its head. Justice Stephen G. Breyer said that todays result threatens to substitute for present calm a disruptive round of race-related litigation, and it undermines Browns promise of integrated primary and secondary education that local communities have sought to make a reality.
This cannot be justified in the name of the Equal Protection Clause, Justice Breyer went on, alluding to the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution, which bars states from denying people the equal protection of the laws.
Justice Breyers dissent was joined by Justices David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and John Paul Stevens, the tribunals longest-serving member, who wrote a separate dissent that was remarkable for its feeling.
While I join Justice Breyers eloquent and unanswerable dissent in its entirety, it is appropriate to add these words, Justice Stevens wrote. There is a cruel irony in the chief justices reliance on our decision in Brown vs. Board of Education.
Todays ruling breaks faith with the 1954 ruling, Justice Stevens asserted. It is my firm conviction that no member of the court that I joined in 1975 would have agreed with todays decision, he wrote.
Justice Kennedys opinion concurring in part with Chief Justice Roberts, and with the overall judgment, agreed that the Seattle and Louisville plans went too far. However, in language that some people on the losing side found heartening, he said that race may still be a component of plans to achieve diversity in the schools.
Diversity, depending on its meaning and definition, is a compelling educational goal a school district may pursue, he wrote.
But Mark Rahdert, a Temple Law School professor and a former clerk to Supreme Court Justice Harry A. Blackmun, said that todays ruling means that racial balance will be the new catchphrase conservatives will use to attempt to eradicate any form of affirmative action.
As for Justice Kennedys willingness to leave the door open to some forms of affirmative action, it will be impossible as a practical matter, Mr. Rahdert said.
The decision today, in Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District, No. 05-908, and Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education, No. 05-915, runs to some 180 pages, including the dissents. It was eagerly awaited by the National School Boards Association and by the Council of the Great City Schools, representing 66 urban districts, which had filed briefs on behalf of Seattle and Louisville and had warned of disruption if the justices overturned lower court rulings upholding the diversity plans.
The Bush administration participated as a friend of the court on behalf of the plaintiffs who challenged the diversity plans.
One plaintiff was a white woman in Louisville whose son was denied a transfer to attend kindergarten in a school that needed more black pupils to keep its black population at the districts required minimum of 15 percent.
The other plaintiffs were Seattle parents who opposed the districts tiebreaker system, which applies only to the citys 10 high schools and is aimed at keeping the nonwhite proportion of their student bodies within 15 percentage points of the districts overall makeup, which is 60 percent nonwhite.
Harry Korrell, lead attorney for the plaintiff-parents in Seattle, said his clients were very pleased with todays decision. This case was about protecting all children regardless of skin color from race discrimination, he said.
Unlike the Seattle district, the Jefferson County school system was once segregated by law. Its current diversity plan was adopted in 2000, after the district emerged from 25 years of federal court supervision.